Legal Opinion

Monak v. Ford Motor Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 5, 2004No. 02-3099PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JORDAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs-Appellants, Linette Monak (“Monak”)1 and Stephen Monak, appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Defendant-Appellee Ford Motor Co. and dismissal of the case. Monak brought suit under Ohio law against her employer, Defendant-Appellee, Ford Motor Company (“Ford”), for intentional infliction of emotional distress, gender and disability discrimination, and harassment based on gender and disability. Stephen Monak brought a claim for loss of consortium. For the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

I. BACKGROUND

Linnette…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Michael Threat v. City of Cleveland, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  2. Kesler v. Barris, Sott, Denn & Driker, PLLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
  3. Range v. DouglasDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
  4. Ellis v. Clinton County Board of CommissionersDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
  5. Ganz v. Pappas Restaurant, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API