Legal Opinion

Rudulph v. Hodo

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 1, 1934No. 3 Div. 95PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The estate was duly removed from the probate court to the court of equity for a construction of the will and for administration of the estate. Upshaw v. Eubank et al. (Ala. Sup.) 151 So. 837; 1 Hinson v. Naugher, 207 Ala. 592, 93 So. 560; Naugher v. Hinson, 211 Ala. 278, 100 So. 221; Watson v. White, 216 Ala. 396, 113 So. 260.

The fourth paragraph of the will is: “I hereby nominate, constitute and appoint my wife Caroline Caffey Rudulph, my daughter Florence Rudulph, and Z. T. Rudulph, as Executors of this my will, with full power to carry out my wishes, and having absolute…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gunter v. TownsendSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  2. Ralls v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Montgomery v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Hinson v. NaugherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Upshaw v. EubankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Baker v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  2. Whitaker v. KennamerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API