Legal Opinion

People in Interest of CE

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 25, 1996No. 95CA1720PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge HUME.

In this dependency or neglect proceeding, S.C. (maternal aunt) appeals from a trial court order denying her motion to intervene. We affirm in part and vacate in part.

In February 1994, shortly after the petition in dependency or neglect was filed, the Adams County Department of Social Services (department) notified the maternal aunt of the proceeding and asked if she would be interested in assuming temporary custody of the child, C.E. For personal reasons, the maternal aunt declined, and the child was placed in foster eare.The proceeding progressed to termination of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People ex rel. S.R.M.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. in Interest of M.BColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. In the Matter of A.L.B.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. In re R.A.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. In Re Richard G.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API