Legal Opinion

Hazelwood v. Bailey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 10, 1995No. 544PA93PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

Plaintiff presents two related issues on this appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred in granting defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claim due to the incorrect designation of the county on the civil summons form, and (2) whether the trial court erred in denying plaintiff’s motion to amend his summons under Rule 4(i) of the North Car olina Rules of Civil Procedure to substitute the correct county on the summons when there was no showing of any material prejudice to defendants. We answer the first question in the affirmative and therefore reverse the Court of Appeals. As…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. A. H. Fischer Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  2. Lemons v. Old Hickory Council, Boy Scouts of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Harris v. MareadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Wiles v. Welparnel Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Harrell v. . WelsteadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fender v. DeatonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Wetchin v. Ocean Side Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Covenant Equip. Corp. v. Forklift Pro, Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2008
  4. Boyd v. SANDLINGCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. Leak v. HollarSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API