Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jones v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 26, 1994No. 2Published

1DissentBell, Judge

The majority today holds that when a defendant is convicted of three crimes of violence arising out of a single incident and all three convictions qualify as his third crime of violence conviction, a sentencing judge has discretion to impose the sentence mandated by Maryland Code (1957, 1992 Repl. Vol.) Article 27, § 643B(e) (the “section 643B(c) sentence”), with respect to any of the three qualifying convictions. It justifies that result by reasoning, where imposing the section 643B(c) sentence to each of the qualifying convictions would result in different sentences, the sentencing judge is…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ladner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Monoker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. Mustafa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API