Legal Opinion

Trans-Vaughn Development Corp. v. Cummings

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 2, 2005No. A05A1057PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bernes, Judge.

Defendant Trans-Vaughn Development Corporation appeals from the trial court’s order denying its motion for summary judgment. Trans-Vaughn contends the trial court erred in denying its motion because the undisputed material facts show that plaintiff Shelley Cummings had equal knowledge of the alleged dangerous condition of the entranceway where she slipped and fell. We agree and reverse.

Summary judgment is appropriate when there are no genuine issues of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Botterbusch v. Preussag Intl. Steel Corp., 271 Ga. App.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  2. Hannah v. Hampton Auto Parts, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. Hallberg v. Flat Creek Animal Clinic, P. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Bastien v. Metropolitan Park Lake Associates, L.P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  5. Gantt v. Dave & Buster's of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Norman v. Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Perkins v. Val D'Aosta Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. Cocklin v. JC Penney Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. Nemeth v. Rreef America, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  5. Barnes v. Morganton Baptist Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API