Legal Opinion
Gantt v. Dave & Buster's of Georgia, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided January 28, 2005No. A04A1668PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Judge.
Gretta Gantt appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary-judgment to the appellees (hereinafter Dave & Buster’s) on her claim for personal injuries suffered when she fell on a step-down at a Dave & Buster’s facility. For the following reasons, we affirm.
To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must show that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law. Lau’s Corp. v. Haskins, 261 Ga. 491 (405 SE2d 474) (1991). When…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Robinson v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Hannah v. Hampton Auto Parts, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Delk v. Quiktrip Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Perkins v. Val D'Aosta Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Nemeth v. Rreef America, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Orff v. Stonewood Restaurant Group, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Department of Transportation v. Meadow Trace, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Trans-Vaughn Development Corp. v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.