Legal Opinion · Dissent

Heath v. Midco Equipment Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 19, 1974No. 73-211Published

1DissentJohn A. Fogleman, Justice

I consider the dump trucks in this case to clearly fall within the exemption. They are certainly machinery or equipment used directly in producing, assembling or finishing articles of commerce at a manufacturing or processing plant or facility. This would bring them within the purview of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 84-1904 (r) (2) (Supp. 1073), unless excluded by the clause “but only to the extent that such machinery is purchased and used for the purposes set forth in this subsection.” The only other applicable portion of the subsection is Ark. Stat. Ann. § 84-1904 (r) (2) (C). Under that subsection,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Inwall v. Transpacific Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1940
  2. New England Die Co. v. General Products CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1961
  3. Cheney v. Georgia-Pacific Paper CorporationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  4. Crossett Lumber Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  5. Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee v. De ArmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API