Legal Opinion

Cheney v. Georgia-Pacific Paper Corporation

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 4, 1963No. 5-3090, 3091PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Prank Holt, Associate Justice.

The main question presented in these consolidated cases is whether the use tax exemption provided by statute is applicable to the purchase of turbine generators which are being used by both appellees, Georgia-Pacific Paper Corporation and International Paper Company, in their respective operations of manufacturing or producing paper products. Georgia-Pacific Paper Corporation claims additional exemptions on its purchase of such items as anion resin, a sewer cleaning ball, miscellaneous conveyors, two small turbines, a towmotor and carrier, and recorder chart…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hilger v. Harding CollegeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  2. Ark. State Highway Comm. v. MabrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  3. City of Ames v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  4. Wiseman v. Arkansas Wholesale Grocers' Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  5. Scurlock v. HendersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Pledger v. Baldor International, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Arkansas Beverage Company v. HeathSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  3. Floyd Charcoal Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  4. Indiana Dept. of St. Rev., Sales Tax Div. v. RCA Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Schenley Distillers, Inc. v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. LuckettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API