Legal Opinion

Johanna Kipperman v. Academy Life Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 24, 1977No. 75-3345PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SNEED, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-appellant Kipperman, through her father, seeks to establish a private right of action under 39 U.S.C. § 3009. Section 3009 makes the mailing of unsolicited “merchandise” a per se unfair trade practice actionable by the Federal Trade Commission. Under section 3009(b), the recipient of unsolicited “merchandise” may treat the item received as a gift. The district court found there was no implied private right of action and dismissed. While we agree that the action should be dismissed, we believe the district court erred in holding that no implied private…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. National Assn. of Railroad PassengersSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. BarbourSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Gladys G. Holloway v. Bristol-Myers CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  5. Ransom v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Sanford v. MemberWorks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Wisniewski v. Rodale, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  3. May Department Store v. Graphic Process Company, and Bel-Aire & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. Keaukaha-Panaewa Community Ass'n v. Hawaiian Homes CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. Hofmayer v. Dean Witter & Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API