Legal Opinion

Malcom Bros. v. Pollock

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 18, 1936No. 11085PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gilbert, Justice.

The two questions shown in the headnote involve the same principles of law, and they may be answered together. The briefs of counsel so treat them. In the brief of the plaintiff in error, however, references are made to parts of the record for the purpose of explaining and enlarging the statement of facts contained in the questions. As repeatedly ruled, this court is limited to the questions as propounded by the Court of Appeals. If, in addition to the facts included in the questions, this court should consider other facts called to its attention by counsel, that would…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Merchants' Bank v. RawlsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
  2. Hayes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
  3. Horne v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Pritchett v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  5. O'Shields v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  2. Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  3. Raab v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Smith v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  5. State v. SeregSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API