Legal Opinion

State v. Sereg

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 11, 1941No. 45546PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBliss, J.

Appellant asks for a reversal because of error of the court in overruling his motion for a new trial, based upon the absence, from the court and the county of trial, of the trial judge, from the time the case was submitted to the jury until after the return of the verdict. Because of this absence of the judge, the appellant asserts that he was denied the right to have the jurors receive additional instructions as requested by them.

This appeal is before us on a clerk’s transcript of the record as provided for in subsection No. 2 of Code section 13998. The trial was begun in the forenoon of…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Thompson v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Capital Traction Co. v. HofSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Callan v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Schick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pines v. District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  2. State of Iowa v. John Arthur Senn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  3. Pitcher v. Lakes Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  4. Advisory Opinion to the SenateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
  5. State v. BergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API