Legal Opinion

O'Shields v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 11, 1888PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Practice in superior court. Before Judge Eain. Bartow superior court. January term, 1887. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Blandeord, Justice.

It is not contended that the defendant is not guilty under the evidence. The main ground of error relied upon is the temporary absence of the judge from the court-room during the progress of the trial. It appears that the judge stated to counsel for the defendant that he desired to step out a little while, and asked if counsel had any objection ; he replied that he had none; the judge went out and was absent but two or three minutes. It does not appear that anything happened in his absence to the prejudice of the defendant. No objection was made and no motion was submitted…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  2. Bateson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
  3. Horne v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  5. People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API