State v. Kelly
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GEAHAM, Judge.
The evidence and the charge are not included in the record and the only question defendant raises in his brief is whether the court erred in denying his motion in arrest of judgment. This presents for review the question of whether the bill of indictment is fatally defective. We hold that it is not.
The indictment is based on G.S. 90-108 which provided, at the time of defendant’s arrest and trial, the following:
“No person except a manufacturer of a wholesaler or a retail dealer in surgical instruments, pharmacist, physi-can, dentist, veterinarian, nurse or interne shall at any…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. RieraSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. PardonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burgess v. GriffinDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1984
- State v. McLambCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984