State v. Hudson

EAGLES, Judge.

I

Defendant first assigns as error the admission into evidence of tape recordings of conversations between Agent Bryant and the defendant. The basis of defendant’s argument is that there was no proper foundation laid for the admission into evidence of the tape recordings in question. We find no error.

To lay a proper foundation for admission into evidence of tape recordings, the State must properly authenticate the evi*392dence. In State v. Lynch, 279 N.C. 1, 181 S.E. 2d 561 (1971) our Supreme Court set forth the factors which must be shown for proper authentication:(1) That the…