Grilz v. Sanchez

qualifier and giver of professional advice. These payments were given and taxed as though Grilz was an employee. Eventually, CCPLS decided to terminate Grilz's employment and stop making monthly payments. Sanchez asserts that by that time, the total amount paid to Grilz was the value he would have been paid for the business. CCPLS also repaid the $10,000. Grilz sued Sanchez and CCPLS for breach of contract and unjust enrichment, and also requested declaratory relief. He supports his claims with affidavits from two of his sons and a family friend, all of whom gave examples of times Sanchez…