Kendrick v. Beard
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Clair. (Canfield, J.) Trover. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The plaintiff sues in trover for the value of one span of horses.
In 1884 he was the owner of the horses, and had been *183working with them for one David Beard, a brother of the defendant. On February 5 in that year he sold the horses to said David Beard for $300, receiving $30 in cash, and the following instrument, in payment of the same:
“Camp, Hunt Creek, Mich., February 5, 1884
“On the first.day of April next I promise to pay to George Kendrick the sum of two hundred and seventy dollars, being balance due on one span of horses bought of him, said horses to be holden to him as security for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Clayton v. . HesterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
- Gushee v. RobinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1885
3Cited by7 opinions
- McIntosh v. GroomesMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Atkinson v. JapinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Borden v. Fletcher's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- F. J. Dewes Brewery Co. v. MerrittMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Pettyplace v. Groton Bridge & Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.