Pettyplace v. Groton Bridge & Manufacturing Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
JSrror to Saginaw. (McKnight, J.) Trover. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Long, J
This action was brought to recover the value of a one-third interest in an engine and threshing machine. Defendant had verdict- and judgment under the direction of the court.
It appears that in July, 1890, B. R. Cushman, William N. Cushman, and A. R. Dodge entered into a contract in writing with the defendant for the purchase of the engine and thresher for the price of $1,550. To secure the payment of the purchase price four notes were to be given. The property was delivered in August, and the notes given. The first was for $387.50, and was signed by all the parties; the second was…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Thirlby v. RainbowMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Preston v. WhitneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Button v. TraderMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Johnston v. WhittemoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Peninsular General Electric Co. v. NorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mizell Live Stock Co. v. J. J. McCaskill Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1910
- Atkinson v. JapinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- McDonald Automobile Co. v. BicknellTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
- Bunday v. Columbus Machine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Federal Commercial & Savings Bank v. International Clay MacHinery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.