Legal Opinion

Pettyplace v. Groton Bridge & Manufacturing Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1894PublishedCited by 15 opinions

JSrror to Saginaw. (McKnight, J.) Trover. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Long, J

This action was brought to recover the value of a one-third interest in an engine and threshing machine. Defendant had verdict- and judgment under the direction of the court.

It appears that in July, 1890, B. R. Cushman, William N. Cushman, and A. R. Dodge entered into a contract in writing with the defendant for the purchase of the engine and thresher for the price of $1,550. To secure the payment of the purchase price four notes were to be given. The property was delivered in August, and the notes given. The first was for $387.50, and was signed by all the parties; the second was…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Thirlby v. RainbowMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Preston v. WhitneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Button v. TraderMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Johnston v. WhittemoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Peninsular General Electric Co. v. NorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mizell Live Stock Co. v. J. J. McCaskill Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1910
  2. Atkinson v. JapinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. McDonald Automobile Co. v. BicknellTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Bunday v. Columbus Machine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Federal Commercial & Savings Bank v. International Clay MacHinery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API