Legal Opinion
Young Sik Woo v. Glantz
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided November 1, 1983No. Civ. A. No. 83-0165-SPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SELYA, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, as against defendant Ronald H. Glantz (“Glantz”), brought pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 56. The plaintiffs have.filed, inter alia, the statement of material facts required by Local Rule 12.1(a)(1). Glantz has objected, but has filed no counter-statement of material facts, nor has he rebutted in kind the affidavits and kindred materials proffered by the movants. Instead, he argues that invocation of his constitutional privilege against self-inculpation, asserted during…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Robert C. Hahn v. Francis W. SargentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Carl D. Wehling and Geraldine D. Wehling v. Columbia Broadcasting SystemCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Securities And Exchange Commission v. Graystone Nash, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Johnson v. Missouri Board of Nursing AdministratorsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Interim Investors Committee v. JacobyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1988
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Bartlett (In Re Bartlett)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1993
- Penfield v. VenutiDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.