Legal Opinion

State Highway Commission v. Adams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 1, 1936No. 26376PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

The essential facts in this ease are quite similar to the facts in Hawks et al. v. Walsh, 177 Okla. 564, 61 P. (2d) 1109, and State Highway Commission v. Brixey, No. 25986, 178 Okla. 118, 61 P. (2d) 1114, decided by this court October 6, 1936. Here there were no former condemnation proceedings to determine the damage payment to the landowner plaintiff, but there was a right-of-way grant executed by plaintiff after agreement as to the damage. There was also a subsequent and additional right-of-way grant for the widening of the road, for which also the agreed damage was paid. The highway was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hawks v. WalshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. State Highway Commission v. BrixeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Henry v. Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  2. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. McKnightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  3. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. HoebelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  4. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. State ex rel. Department of Highways v. KeenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API