Stanbrough v. Cook
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Delaware District Court.■ — Hon. D. J. Lenehan, Judge. This action is based upon the same facts and transactions as that between the same parties reported in 83 Iowa, 705, except that this action is for the value of the crop of 1890, while that action was for the crops of the years 1888 and 1889. In this ease there was a judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.
The appellant states the following as particulars wherein this case differs from the former, and bases a claim for reversal thereon: “First. That was for the value of the crops of 1888 and 1889; this is for the value of the crops of 1890. Second. At the time of the acts upon which the liability was asserted in that action, the decree by publi*741■cation against Susan E. Daniels had not been opened. At the time of the acts upon which the liability is asserted in this action, said decree had been opened, and the matter was' pending accordingly. Third. At the time of the acts upon which the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Stanbrough v. CookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
3Cited by4 opinions
- Porter v. SmallOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Clark v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Stanbrough v. DanielsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- Tracy v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929