Stanbrough v. Cook
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Delaware District Cowrt. — Hon. D. J. Lenehan, Judge. Action to recover the value of certain pasturage and crops alleged to have belonged to the plaintiff, and to have been wrongfully appropriated by the defendant, and converted to his own use. There was a trial by the court, without the intervention of a jury, and a judgment in favor of defendant. The plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
The pasturage and crops in controversy grew on land which is owned by the plaintiff. He obtained the title as follows: In March, 1882, H. P. Chapman, then the owner of the land, executed a mortgage thereon to one Emma Chase, which was duly recorded on the first day of April of that year. That mortgage was foreclosed by a decree which was rendered on the fifteenth day of February, 1887. On the twelfth day of the next September the land was sold to the plaintiff under the decree of foreclosure, and on the fifteenth day of September, 1888, a sheriff’s deed therefor was executed and delivered to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hecht v. DettmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
- Downard v. GroffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
- Shricker v. FieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
- Martin v. KnappSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
- Shaw v. HeiseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Clark v. StrohbeenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Griffith v. Milwaukee Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Newburn v. LucasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Johnson v. SiedelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Sioux City Stock Yards Co. v. Sioux City Packing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1900
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.