Legal Opinion

People v. Howard

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 6, 1995No. B070472PublishedCited by 8 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

Defendants and appellants Andrew Lee Howard and James Joshua appeal the judgments entered following their convictions of conspiracy to purchase cocaine for sale and unlawful possession of moneys in excess of $100,000. (Pen. Code, § 182, subd. (a)(1); Health & Saf. Code, §§ 11351, 11370.6.)

The trial court found both defendants had conspired to purchase in excess of 10 pounds of a substance containing cocaine within the meaning of former section 11370.4, subdivision (a)(2), 2 and that Howard personally had been armed in the commission of conspiracy to purchase cocaine for…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. People v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. People v. ClairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. MoranteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. United States v. Palacios-QuinonezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  3. People v. ChevalierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. United States v. Estrada-SotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API