Legal Opinion

Cummings v. Bean

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 23, 2004PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

[¶ 1] David Bean appeals from an order entered in the District Court (South Paris, Beliveau, J.) denying his motion for relief from judgment pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4). The court had previously entered a judgment awarding Richard Cummings Sr. money damages against Bean on Cummings’s quantum meruit claim. Bean contends that the court erred by not granting his motion for relief from judgment because the court did not have subject matter jurisdiction to award quantum *223meruit relief, and therefore the judgment is void. We conclude that the court had subject matter jurisdiction and affirm.

I.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Paffhausen v. BalanoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  2. Bowden v. GrindleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  3. Boyer v. BoyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  4. Town of Carmel v. McSorleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Wal-Mart Wage & Hour Employment Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2007
  2. Bean v. CummingsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  3. In Re: Light Cigarettes Marketing Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2010
  4. Estate of Mary E. HillerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  5. Michael Dinan v. Alpha Networks Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API