Legal Opinion

Goldbaum v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 14, 1953No. 13383_1PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Circuit Judge.

Appellants were defendants under an indictment containing thirteen counts and upon trial before the court sitting without a jury, were convicted upon all except counts 11 and 12. Of those upon which they were found guilty nine charged in come tax evasion; 1 one charged the making of a false partnership return; 2 and one charged a conspiracy to commit such offenses. Title 18, U.S.C.A. § 371.

The principal assignments of error urged by the appellants are to the effect that the evidence was insufficient to support the judgments of guilty upon these various counts. As sentences…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Abrams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. BORDEN’S FARM PRODUCTS CO., INC. v. TEN EYCK, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE & MARKETS OF NEW YORK, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Gleckman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Meyer Harris Cohen, AKA Michael 'Mickey' Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. Remmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  3. Leo Elwert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  4. State v. TurnbowNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Goldbaum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API