Legal Opinion

In re Original Grand Jury Investigation

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 2000No. 99-1658PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

The issue presented in this case is whether an attorney can be compelled to disclose to the grand jury a letter written by a client *546and discovered by an investigator that contains evidence of a possible crime or whether the Ohio Code of Professional Responsibility prohibits such disclosure.

At the outset, we understand that appellant was faced with an ethical dilemma and had the difficult decision of determining how to respond to the competing challenges of maintaining client confidentiality and preserving the safety concerns of the public. We appreciate that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Morrell v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. GreenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  4. Purcell v. District Attorney for Suffolk DistrictMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  5. In Re Richard R. RyderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Akron Bar Ass'n v. HolderOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Allen County Bar Ass'n v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Allen Cty. Bar Assn. v. WilliamOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In re Original Grand Jury InvestigationOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. CinelliMassachusetts Superior Court · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API