Legal Opinion

Allen Cty. Bar Assn. v. William

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 2002No. 2000-2251PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 95 Ohio St.3d 160.] ALLEN COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. WILLIAMS. [Cite as Allen Cty. Bar Assn. v. Williams,

2002-Ohio-2006.] Attorneys at law—Monitoring attorney may not interfere with attorney-client privilege between respondent and his clients by reviewing privileged materials without the client’s specific waiver of the privilege—Monitoring attorney’s oversight limited to unprivileged matters. (No. 2000-2251—Submitted January 9, 2002—Decided May 8, 2002.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. McDermottOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Frank W. Schaefer, Inc. v. C. Garfield Mitchell Agency, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. In Re LeardoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Howard v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. In Re SolomonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Leslie v. Ohio Housing Finance AgencyOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. Cheselka (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API