Legal Opinion
In re Original Grand Jury Investigation
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 6, 2000No. 1999-1658PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 544.] IN RE ORIGINAL GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION. [Cite as In re Original Grand Jury Investigation,
2000-Ohio-170.] Attorneys at law—Where attorney receives physical evidence from a third party relating to a possible crime by client, attorney is obligated to relinquish that evidence to law-enforcement authorities and must comply with a subpoena issued to that effect. (No. 99-1658—Submitted May 9, 2000—Decided September 6, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County, No. L-98-1146. __________________ {¶ 1}…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Morrell v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- Purcell v. District Attorney for Suffolk DistrictMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- In Re Richard R. RyderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. Doe, Unpublished Decision (9-19-2002)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002