Legal Opinion

Twin City Fire Ins. v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins.

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided December 7, 2000No. Civil Action 99D935-NPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DE MENT, District Judge.

Before the court is a Renewed Motion For Summary Judgment filed by counterclaim Defendants Twin City Insurance Company and The Hartford Casualty Insurance Company (“Twin City,” “Hartford,” or “Defendants”) on July 27, 2000. Counterclaim Plaintiff Colonial Life and Accident Insurance Company (“Colonial” or “Plaintiff’) filed a Response on October 27, 2000. Defendants issued a Reply on November 3, 2000. 1 The court granted Plaintiff additional leave to supplement the record, but denied a similar request by Defendants, for they failed to comply…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sterne, Agee & Leach, Inc. v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
  2. Allstate Insurance v. Wagner-EllsworthMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Trinh v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. Knutsen v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.District Court, D. Vermont · 2019
  5. Haralson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API