Legal Opinion
Grumbine v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 3, 1984No. Civ. A. 82-1938PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAROLD H. GREENE, District Judge.
This case involves a significant issue of first impression: what is the meaning of the term “establishment” under the Equal Pay Act for purposes of employment in the federal government?
Plaintiff Margaret Mary Grumbine was a Regional Counsel of the Customs Service assigned to Baltimore, Maryland. At all times pertinent to this lawsuit, the Customs Service was divided into nine regions 1 and so was the Chief Counsel’s Office of that Service. 2 Although each of the other eight individuals serving as Regional Counsel in the Customs Service, all of them…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Peyton v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Marilyn M. Mulhall v. Advance Security, Inc., Figgie International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Parker v. BurnleyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1988
- Hauschild v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Molden v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.