Legal Opinion

People v. Horn

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 1, 1984No. Crim. 12926PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPARKS, J.

"It is fundamental to our system of jurisprudence that a person cannot be convicted for acts performed while insane.” (People v. Kelly (1973) 10 Cal.3d 565, 574 [111 Cal.Rptr. 171, 516 P.2d 875].) But who is insane? In this case we explore that question by considering the type of showing which will support a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity under Penal Code section 25, subdivision (b), a new statute added to that code by the enactment of Proposition 8, the Victim’s Bill of Rights, at the June 1982 Primary Election. Under this statute, a defendant is insane only…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Durham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  4. De Sylva v. BallentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. People v. FieldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. BigelowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. SkinnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. FoleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. People v. LeeverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API