People v. Horn
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPARKS, J.
"It is fundamental to our system of jurisprudence that a person cannot be convicted for acts performed while insane.” (People v. Kelly (1973) 10 Cal.3d 565, 574 [111 Cal.Rptr. 171, 516 P.2d 875].) But who is insane? In this case we explore that question by considering the type of showing which will support a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity under Penal Code section 25, subdivision (b), a new statute added to that code by the enactment of Proposition 8, the Victim’s Bill of Rights, at the June 1982 Primary Election. Under this statute, a defendant is insane only…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Durham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- De Sylva v. BallentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- People v. FieldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. BigelowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. SkinnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. FoleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- People v. LeeverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.