Legal Opinion
People v. Foley
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 6, 1985No. 13459PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
In this case, we hold a supplemental presentence probation report must be prepared for use at a defendant’s resentencing following an appeal, even where the defendant is ineligible for probation. In so holding, we disapprove a footnote to the contrary in our prior opinion in People v. Savala (1983) 147 Cal.App.3d 63 [195 Cal.Rptr. 193]. We also determine that in prosecutions for multiple offenses which include violation of either Penal Code 1 section 286, subdivision (c) or section 288a, subdivision (c) involving a threat of great bodily harm, the prosecution should plead that…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Specht v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wasman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. KaramanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Joseph Scott Hunter, A/K/A Raymond C. Dirker v. Bernie Aispuro, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- People v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.