Legal Opinion

Simms Oil Co. v. Flanagan

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 4, 1924No. 25687PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.

Plaintiff, a Texas corporation, duly qualified to do business in Louisiana by designation of the city of Shreveport as its principal place of business, and by appointment of an agent residing there for the service of process, is the owner of certain tank ears operated partly within this state.

In the year 1921 the Louisana Tax Commission assessed said company with a proportion of the value of said tank cars under the provisions of Act No. 9 of 1917 (Ex. Sess.), and, under the authority of the same statute, the assessment as fixed by the tax commission was extended on the assessment rolls of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. W. K. Henderson Iron Works & Supply Co. v. JeterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. White Oil Corp. v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  3. Gulf Refining Co. v. TillinghastSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  4. Oden v. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  5. State ex rel. Lemoine v. MorrowSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Simms Oil Co. v. WolfeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1925
  2. Louisiana A. Ry. Co. v. School of Webster ParishSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  3. Simms Oil Co. v. WolfeDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API