Gulf Refining Co. v. Tillinghast
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.
The sole issue involved in this case is the constitutionality vel non of section 5 of Act 9 of 1917, which declares in effect that the rolling stock belonging to nonresidents and operated over the railroads of this state shall be assessed and taxed for all purposes, state and local, at the domicile declared by such nonresident; otherwise at the state capital.
It is not contested that such rolling stock may be so taxed for state purposes, and that the method prescribed by the statute and adopted by the assessing authorities for ascertaining the proportion of such rolling stock within the state…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Constantin Refining Co. v. DaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- Board of Supervisors v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907
3Cited by7 opinions
- White Oil Corp. v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- Board of County Com'rs v. Johnson Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HulbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Simms Oil Co. v. WolfeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1925
- Simms Oil Co. v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.