White Oil Corp. v. Flanagan
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.
This is a suit to cancel an assessment and to en jo-in the collection of taxes based thereon. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant has appealed. The case was tried and decided upon the following agreed statement of facts, to wit;
“The plaintiff, the White Oil Corporation,' is a corporation orpamigprl nnrl existing under the laws of the state oiDelaware. and on January 1, 1921,"maintained its principal business establishment and offices at No. 06 Broad street, New York City; its present chief place of business and principal offices are located in the Binz Building, Houston, Tex.
“On…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thornhill v. WearSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
- Gulf Refining Co. v. TillinghastSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Union Tank Line Co. v. DaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Shreveport v. BristerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- Peoples Homestead & Savings Ass'n v. MaslingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Wm. M. Barret, Inc. v. First Nat. Bank of ShreveportSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- State v. MonteleoneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- Succession of Watson v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.