Legal Opinion
Artley v. McLouth Steel Corp. General Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 3, 1988No. 86-2107Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
848 F.2d 188
9 Employee Benefits Ca 2413
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Joseph C. ARTLEY, et al, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
McLOUTH STEEL CORPORATION GENERAL RETIREMENT PLAN FOR
SALARIED EMPLOYEES, Ernest Brocher, William Panny, Robert P.
Perkins, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, as Trustee of
McLouth Steel Corporation General Retirement Plan for
Salaried…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Albert Van Boxel, Cross-Appellee v. The Journal Company Employees' Pension Trust, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Varhola v. DoeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Ronald Adcock, Cross v. The Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Bertie Mae Rhoton v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- In Re Arnett (Richard)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.