Legal Opinion

United States v. Sumner

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thompson, J.:

Defendants challenge the authority of the district attorney to bring this action and the power of the court to take cognizance of it, upon the ground that the State having expressly refused to pass legislation providing for the enforcement of the National Prohibition Act (41 U. S. Stat. at Large, 305) by its officers or in its courts, such power and authority is thereby impliedly denied them. This is an erroneous and vicious conception. The National Prohibition Act is the supreme law of the land, and neither the State, its citizens or its courts can override it. The State derives…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. People v. ErwinNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  3. City of Shreveport v. MarounSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  4. Carse v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. People ex rel. Watts v. Board of SupervisorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. ContiNew York Supreme Court · 1926
  2. United States v. RichardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. People v. WadeNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1926
  4. United States v. SirianniNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Cole v. United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API