Legal Opinion

City of Shreveport v. Maroun

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 5, 1914No. 19,936PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from City Court of Shreveport; L. C. Blanchard, Judge. Philip Maroun was convicted of maintaining a public nuisance in violation of an ordinance of the city of Shreveport, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSommer Ville, J.

Defendant was charged with and found guilty of maintaining a public nuisance in the city of Shreveport, by keeping a “blind tiger,” and he appeals.

There are three bills of exceptions found in the record, all to the same effect, and they will be considered together.

Defendant was charged, April 17, 1913, with maintaining a public nuisance by keeping a “blind tiger” on the 24th day of February, 1913, contrary to the ordinance of the city of Shreveport, specially ordinance No. 5, which is made part of the bills of exceptions, and it is found in the record.

The first objection to the charge was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Fertilizing Co. v. Hyde ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Lofton v. CollinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. State v. FourcadeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Shreveport v. NejinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  2. State v. BeeneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  3. State v. LassiterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  4. City of Shreveport v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  5. United States v. SumnerNew York Supreme Court · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API