Legal Opinion

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports

Decided March 31, 1998Published

1Opinion of the Court

W. Newton Male Bank Commissioner Office of the State Bank Commissioner 700 Jackson, Suite 300 Topeka, Kansas 66603-3714

Dear Commissioner Male:

As Bank Commissioner you request our opinion on whether businesses which offer bi-weekly mortgage payment plans violate K.S.A. 21-4402, which prohibits debt adjusting. Specifically, you ask whether the fact that these mortgage payment plans direct payments to only one creditor places these plans outside the scope of K.S.A. 21-4402; whether the type of fee charged or the individual's failure to pay the fee places these mortgage payment plans outside the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Davey v. HeddenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  3. State Ex Rel. Sanborn v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. Blue v. McBrideSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  5. Long v. BuehlerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API