Legal Opinion

CGU Insurance v. Tyson Associates

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 2001No. Civ. A. 99-2505PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ROBERT F. KELLY, District Judge.

Presently before this Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Defendants, Tyson Associates and Jerald Mirrow (“Tyson” and “Mirrow”, or collectively “Defendants”) and the Cross Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Plaintiff, CGU Insurance (“CGU”). These Motions concern CGU’s duty to defend the Defendants in both federal and state actions arising from the same factual scenario. For the following reasons, the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part and CGU’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment is…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Wisniewski v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  5. Gedeon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mt. Hawley Insurance v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Vermont Mutual Insurance v. Parsons Hill PartnershipSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  3. IDS Property Casualty Insurance v. SchonewolfDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Henkel Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. GRIFFEL v. RSUI GROUP, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API