Legal Opinion

Cole v. Holton

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 19, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This case comes before us for the second time on appeal from final decree after rescript. The case is reported in 272 Mass. 565. As a result of the exhaustive opinion there rendered the final decree with some modifications was affirmed with costs. After the rescript from this court the defendant Holton filed a motion for a new trial on the ground, in substance, that he had made a mistake of law in presenting his case and that justice required that there be further hearing. - This motion was denied after hearing, and a final decree after rescript was entered. If it be assumed in favor of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Day v. MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Cole v. HoltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carilli v. HerseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. J. J. Struzziery Co. v. A. V. Taurasi Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  3. Dondis v. LashMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API