Legal Opinion

Illinois Fire Insurance v. Stanton

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1870PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Peoria county; the Hon, Sabin D. Putebbaugh, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

This was an action of assumpsit, brought by the appellee in the Peoria circuit court, against the appellant, on a policy of insurance issued to Matthew Stanton, on a mill and distillery building, and the machinery and fixtures therein contained. The amount of the insurance was $3,000, which was, by the terms of the policy, made payable, in case of loss, to John McClellan, who held a mortgage on the premises.

The action is brought in the name of Matthew Stanton, for the use of John H. Bobb, the assignee of the McClellan mortgage. The declaration sets forth the policy sued on, and the several…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sheldon v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
  2. Peck v. New London County Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852
  3. Buckbee v. United States InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1854
  4. New England Fire & Marine Insurance v. WetmoreIllinois Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Williamsburg City Fire Insurance v. CaryIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Phenix Insurance v. HartIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Hartford Fire Insurance v. OlcottIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Stott v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. CarsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1897

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API