Louisville Underwriters v. Durland
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Vanderburgh Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBerkshire, J.
This was an action upon a marine insurance policy. There was a trial below and a judgment rendered for the appellees.
The appellant assigns two errors in this court:
1st. The court erred in overruling the demurrer to the complaint.
2d. The court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.
We find no objection to the complaint. By the terms of the policy the appellant was liable for any loss occasioned to the steamer by fire, “except when caused by explosion of *546boiler,” and except as limited by certain warranties contained in the policy. The complaint alleges that the loss was caused by fire…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. HazelettIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Piedmont, Etc. Life-Ins. Co. v. Ewing, Etc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Mutual Life Insurance v. WilerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Phenix Insurance v. PickelIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Home Insurance v. DukeIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Jenkins v. United States Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- Celina Mutual Insurance v. ForisterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Vorse v. Jersey Plate Glass InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- AHLBORN v. City of HammondIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
- Chrysler Corporation v. The Hanover Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.