Legal Opinion

State v. Damm

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1936No. File No. 7390PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbeee, J.

Defendant was convicted of second-degree rape, and this court affirmed the judgment. State v. Damm (1933) 62 S. D. 123, 252 N. W. 7. That some one had intercourse with prosecutrix at about the date charged in the information was evidenced by the fact that she bore a child' in 'due time thereafter. Prosecutrix maintained that she had never had intercourse with any person other than defendant. Consequently, the issue of paternity became highly material. Defendant, at the trial, asked the court to require prosecutrix and her infant to furnish a few drops of blood for the purpose of having the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Schroeder v. C. R. I. & P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  3. State v. DammSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Ala. Great Southern R. R. v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  5. State Ex Rel. Schlueter Manufacturing Co. v. BeckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1971
  2. Arais v. KalensnikoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Cortese v. CorteseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  4. Beach v. BeachCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  5. State Ex Rel. Walker v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court · 1944

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API