Halloran v. Bhan
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, C.J.
In this interlocutory appeal, we must determine the meaning of the medical malpractice expert witness qualification requirements of MCL 600.2169(l)(a). Here, plaintiffs proffered standard-of-care witness did not possess the same board certification as defendant doctor, although both had the same subspecialty certificate in their respective fields.
We hold that MCL 600.2169(l)(a) requires that the proposed expert witness must have the same board certification as the party against whom or on whose behalf the testimony is offered. Because plaintiffs ex*575pert witness did not share the same board…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Koontz v. Ameritech Services, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- DiBenedetto v. West Shore HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Wickens v. Oakwood Healthcare SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Griffith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Johanna Woodard v. University of Mich Medical CtrMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- In re HudsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- Kevin Krohn v. Home-Owners Ins CoMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
- Polkton Charter Township v. PellegromMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.