Legal Opinion

Peironnet v. Matador Resources Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided August 1, 2012No. 47,190-CAPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaraway, J.

| ] This case involves a large oil and gas lease affecting 1805.34 acres in the southern part of Caddo Parish. The lessors and lessee entered into an 18-month extension agreement in 2007, months prior to the announcement of the Haynesville Shale discovery. The extension of the 3-year primary term of the lease from 3 years to 4 ½ years occurred at a time when a large portion of the lease was already developed by production in units for depths above the Haynesville Shale with only 168.95 acres of the lease experiencing no production activities in 2007 as the original primary term *449was ending.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Wooley v. LucksingerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
  2. Nicholas v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  3. United States v. Robert J. L'hoste, R. J. L'Hoste & Company, Inc., Clarence Eugene Rogers and Marvin Cochran, in Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. Hunter Co. v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
  5. Kaplan v. Missouri Pacific R. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Peironnet v. Matador Resources Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
  2. Franklin v. Camterra Resources Partners, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Questar Exploration & Production Co. v. Woodard Villa, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Franklin v. Camterra Resources Partners, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Franklin v. Camterra Resources Partners, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API