Legal Opinion

People v. Winner

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 7, 1916No. Crim. No. 491PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Upon an information filed by the district attorney of Kern County the defendant was, on March 16, 1916, convicted of the crime of grand larceny. On March 20th he presented to the court a motion for a new trial, the hearing of which was by the court continued to March 27th, at which time the court, as shown by the minutes thereof, made an entry as follows: "By consent of counsel for respective parties in open court, it is by the court ordered that said motion for a new trial be and the same is hereby submitted upon briefs to be presented within five, five and two days.” On April 4th, more than…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rankin v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1910
  2. People v. OkomotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  3. People v. PolichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. People v. PrudencioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. People v. LaumanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. People v. ManesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. People v. BolingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API