Legal Opinion

People v. Lauman

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 22, 1922No. Crim. No. 879PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Appellant was convicted of a felony, it being charged that he presented false proofs of loss under a policy of fire insurance. He presented a motion for a new trial, which was denied, and then made a motion in arrest of judgment, which motion was granted. Upon an appeal taken by the people the supreme court reversed the order arresting the judgment. (People v. Lauman, 187 Cal. 214 [201 Pac. 459].) Remittitur certifying the judgment of the supreme court was received and filed in the trial court on the 14th of November, 1921. Defendant had been released on bail and a bench-warrant was issued to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lilly-Brackett Co. v. SonnemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. People v. OkomotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  3. People v. LaumanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. People v. PolichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. People v. WinnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hughes v. De MundCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Odlum v. DuffyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. State v. CloranOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. People v. CommonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Hampton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API