Johnson v. Lewiston Orchards Irrigation District
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BAKES, Justice.
Appellant Mary Ann Johnson brought this action seeking a declaratory judgment that Art. 1, § 20 of the Idaho Constitution and I.C. § 43-111 violate the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution because they deny her, as a non-property owner, the right to vote in elections of the respondent Lewiston Orchards Irrigation District. The district court upheld the constitutionality of I.C. § 43-111 and Art. 1, § 20, and the appellant has appealed from that judgment.
The case was tried on the following agreed statement of facts:
“I
“That plaintiff is a bona fide resident…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Cipriano v. City of HoumaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- City of Phoenix v. KolodziejskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Salyer Land Co. v. Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Town of Lockport v. Citizens for Community Action at the Local Level, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bjornestad v. HulseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Simpson v. CenarrusaIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
- Ball v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Ball v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kessler v. Grand Central District Management Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.