Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ball v. James

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 29, 1981No. 79-1740Published

1Dissent

Justice White,

with whom Justice Brennan, Justice Marshall, and Justice Blackmun join, dissenting.

In concluding that the District’s “one-acre, one-vote” scheme is constitutional, the Court misapplies the limited exception recognized in Salyer Land Co. v. Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District, 410 U. S. 719 (1973), on the strained logic that the provision of water and electricity to several hundred thousand citizens is a “peculiarly narrow function.” Because the Court misreads our prior cases and its opinion is conceptually unsound, I dissent.

*375I

The right to vote is of special importance…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API