Ball v. James
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
Justice White,
with whom Justice Brennan, Justice Marshall, and Justice Blackmun join, dissenting.
In concluding that the District’s “one-acre, one-vote” scheme is constitutional, the Court misapplies the limited exception recognized in Salyer Land Co. v. Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District, 410 U. S. 719 (1973), on the strained logic that the provision of water and electricity to several hundred thousand citizens is a “peculiarly narrow function.” Because the Court misreads our prior cases and its opinion is conceptually unsound, I dissent.
*375I
The right to vote is of special importance…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.